Re: Block-level CRC checks
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200912011242.nB1CgAr22870@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block-level CRC checks (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block-level CRC checks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 07:05 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I assume torn pages are 99% of the reported problem, which are > > expected and are fixed, and bad hardware 1%, quite the opposite of your > > numbers above. > > On what basis do you make that assumption? Because we added full page write protection to fix the reported problem of torn pages, which we had on occasion; now we don't. Bad hardware reports are less frequent. And we know we can reproduce torn pages by shutting of power to a server without battery-backed cache. We don't know how to produce I/O failures on demand. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: