Re: SSD + RAID
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSD + RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200911300309.nAU39j318088@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSD + RAID (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSD + RAID
Re: SSD + RAID |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Ron Mayer wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Greg Smith wrote: > >> A good test program that is a bit better at introducing and detecting > >> the write cache issue is described at > >> http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html > > > > Wow, I had not seen that tool before. I have added a link to it from > > our documentation, and also added a mention of our src/tools/fsync test > > tool to our docs. > > One challenge with many of these test programs is that some > filesystem (ext3 is one) will flush drive caches on fsync() > *sometimes, but not always. If your test program happens to do > a sequence of commands that makes an fsync() actually flush a > disk's caches, it might mislead you if your actual application > has a different series of system calls. > > For example, ext3 fsync() will issue write barrier commands > if the inode was modified; but not if the inode wasn't. > > See test program here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg272253.html > and read two paragraphs further to see how touching > the inode makes ext3 fsync behave differently. I thought our only problem was testing the I/O subsystem --- I never suspected the file system might lie too. That email indicates that a large percentage of our install base is running on unreliable file systems --- why have I not heard about this before? Do the write barriers allow data loss but prevent data inconsistency? It sound like they are effectively running with synchronous_commit = off. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: