Re: Syntax for partitioning
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Syntax for partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091118133617.A4A9.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Syntax for partitioning (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>) |
Ответы |
Re: Syntax for partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: > > * If a table with the same name already exists when a partition > > is created, the table is re-used as partition. This behavior > > is required for pg_dump to be simple. > > i guess the table must be empty, if not we should be throw an error... > and i actually prefer some more explicit syntax for this not just > reusing a table Yeah, an explicit syntax is better. I've researched other syntax, but I cannot find any good ones. * ALTER TABLE child INHERIT parent AS PARTITION => implemenation "PARTITION is an INHERIT" is revealed to user.* ALTERPARTITION child ATTACH TO parent => child is not a partition yet at that point.* ALTER TABLE parent ADD PARTITIONchild => "partition" need to be a full-reserved word. Are there better idea? Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: