Re: New VACUUM FULL
От | Itagaki Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New VACUUM FULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091113104715.12B0.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New VACUUM FULL (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New VACUUM FULL
Re: New VACUUM FULL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > BTW I think the vacstmt.options change, which seems a reasonable idea to > me, could be extracted from the patch and applied separately. That'd > reduce the size of the patch somewhat. It's a good idea. I separated the part into the attached patch. It replaces VacuumStmt's "vacuum", "full", "analyze", and "verbose" fields into one "options" flag field. The only user-visible change is to support "VACUUM (options)" syntax: VACUUM ( FULL, FREEZE, VERBOSE, ANALYZE ) table (columns) We don't bother with the order of options in this form :) There is a debatable issue that we can use "VACUUM (VERBOSE) table (col)" in the abobe syntax. Columns are specified but no ANALYZE option there. An ANALYZE option is added automatically in the current implementation, but we should have thrown an syntax error in such case. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: