Re: next CommitFest
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: next CommitFest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200911130431.nAD4VXu21374@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: next CommitFest (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: next CommitFest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > >> Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time > >> contributors, or even second-time contributors. ?But by about patch #3 > >> I think everyone should be pitching in. > > > > I hate to ask, but how would we enforce this? ?Do we no longer apply > > patches for 3rd-time submitters who have not reviewed? ?That seems to be > > hurting us more than them. ? Are we prepared to discard valid patches > > for this reason? > > We just wouldn't assign round-robin reviewers to such patches. If > someone wants to volunteer, more power to them, but we would encourage > people to focus their efforts on the patches of people who were > themselves reviewing. It's important to keep in mind that "valid" is > not a boolean. Some patches are perfect the day they roll in, but not > too many. It takes work to get them committable, and I don't see why > anyone should have an expectation that they can have that help for > themselves without doing the same thing for other people. OK, but the problem I see there is that the reviewers are there to assist the committers; if no one reviews something, it just makes more work for the committers. > All that having been said, the real shortage ATM is of committers > rather than reviewers. We have plenty of them, but many of them > commit almost nothing. I don't want to minimize the contributions of > the non-Tom committers, but Tom is numerically far and away committing > more than anyone else, and not small patches, either. Beyond the > fact that it makes the CommitFest slow, long, and not too much fun for > Tom, it also means that Tom has less time available to do things that > Only Tom Can Do. I venture to say that there will be Great Excitement > about the enhancements to the EPQ machinery and PL/pgsql that Tom has > recently effected. Well, if Tom hadn't had to single-handedly handle > so many patches last CF, maybe he would have done something else cool, > too. Totally agree. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: