On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 07:57:13PM -0700, daveg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:41:07AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > daveg escribió:
> >
> > > I work with Kunal and have been looking into this. It appears to be the same
> > > as the bug described in:
> > >
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-09/msg00355.php
> > >
> > > as I have localized it to a NULL pointer deference in
> > > RelationCacheInitializePhase2() as well. Tom speculates in:
> > >
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-09/msg00372.php
> > >
> > > that large numbers of table drops might trigger this. The system in question
> > > creates and drops temp tables at a high rate which tends to confirm this.
> >
> > Did you test the patch posted by Tom?
>
> We are testing it since last night in our test environment. If it does not
> break anything (unlikely) we will deploy it next week. However, since the
> problem is only occasional, only happens every few days on one of 50+ hosts,
> it will take some extended time without further segfaults to say anything
> confident about the patches effectiveness.
We have had this deployed in our test and production environments for a
couple weeks now. We have not seen any further instance of the problem.
Without the patch, we would have expected to see at least a few by now.
So the patch appears to be effective.
-dg
--
David Gould daveg@sonic.net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.