Re: COPY enhancements
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY enhancements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091019152148.GA3352@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COPY enhancements (Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: COPY enhancements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gokulakannan Somasundaram escribió: > Actually this problem is present even in today's transaction id scenario and > the only way we avoid is by using freezing. Can we use a similar approach? > This freezing should mean that we are freezing the sub-transaction in order > to avoid the sub-transaction wrap around failure. This would mean we would have to go over the data inserted by the subtransaction and mark it as "subxact frozen". Some sort of sub-vacuum if you will (because it obviously needs to work inside a transaction). Doesn't sound real workable to me. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: