Re: updating a row in a table with only one row
От | Michal Vitecek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: updating a row in a table with only one row |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091006145920.GC15557@mageo.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: updating a row in a table with only one row (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: updating a row in a table with only one row
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Merlin Moncure wrote: >On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Michal Vitecek <fuf@mageo.cz> wrote: > >> Could the problem be the HW RAID card? There's ServerRAID 8k with 256MB >> with write-back enabled. Could it be that its internal cache becomes >> full and all disk I/O operations are delayed until it writes all >> changes to hard drives? > >that's possible...the red flag is going to be iowait. if your server >can't keep up with the sync demands for example, you will eventually >outrun the write cache and you can start to see slow queries. With >your server though it would take in the hundreds of (write) >transactions per second to do that minimum. The problem is that the server is not loaded in any way. The iowait is 0.62%, there's only 72 sectors written/s, but the maximum await that I saw was 28ms (!). Any attempts to reduce the time (I/O schedulers, disabling bgwriter, increasing number of checkpoints, decreasing shared buffers, disabling read cache on the card etc.) didn't help. After some 3-5m there occurs a COMMIT which takes 100-10000x longer time than usual. Setting fsynch to off Temporarily improved the COMMIT times considerably but I fear to have this option off all the time. Is anybody else using the same RAID card? I suspect the problem lies somewhere between the aacraid module and the card. The aacraid module ignores setting of the 'cache' parameter to 3 -- this should completely disable the SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command. Any hints? Thanks, -- Michal Vitecek (fuf@mageo.cz)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: