Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
От | Dan Colish |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091005153715.GE27563@funkstrom.spiretech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:28:13AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Dan Colish wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:50:18AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Colish wrote: > > > > > You can definitely create updatable views using rules. > > > > > > Sure you can, but they won't work in various significant corner cases. > > > > > > Search the archives for "updatable views" for details. > > > > I don't even want updatable views! > > Why would you argue that point? They are specified in the SQL standard > somewhere. > I do not really think updatable views are needed. Maybe when the standard was written things are different; I guess you're talking about 2003. Just because something is in a standard, doesnt mean it has to be implemented. As long as you don't implement something outside of the standard, I do not have an issue. -- --Dan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: