Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091005005456.GA4977@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Oct 4, 2009, at 1:57 PM, David Fetter wrote: > > >It's less about like or dislike and more about facing up to the > >reality that we've got a major legacy foot-gun left over from the > >experimentation of the Berkeley days. > > I think you're going to need to be a bit more concrete than that. In > what way is it a foot-gun? What examples can you provide? What, > exactly, are the issues? While I don't agree with David Fetter's premise, I think rehashing how we handle VIEWs would be a good step towards updatable views. Right now, the implementation of that is stalled precisely because of the rule system. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: