Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors.
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091001230401.GM5607@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Tom Lane escribi�: > >> I don't think that testing rowMarks is the right thing at all here. > >> That tells you whether it's a SELECT FOR UPDATE, but actually we > >> want any cursor (and only cursors) to have a private snapshot. > > > The attached patch implements this. I intend to apply to 8.4 and HEAD > > shortly. > > Looks sane. Can we add a short regression test sequence that checks > for this? Something is wrong with the patch :-( I'm getting WARNING: Snapshot reference leak: Snapshot 0x1be5840 still referenced with a simple test case. Still investigating. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: