Re: BUG #5087: Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner (or at all)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5087: Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner (or at all) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090929222647.GP6116@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5087: Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner (or at all) (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5087: Submitted bug reports not showing up in a timely manner (or at all)
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andrew Gierth escribió: > >>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com> writes: > > >> > To pick a recent case, bug #5085 was submitted by an IRC user (at my > >> > suggestion) at 2009-09-28 22:12 +0000, or a bit over 22 hours ago as I write > > Joshua> I am a -bugs moderator, and don't see that I ever got a > Joshua> notice that I needed to approve #5085. I did get one for 5804 > Joshua> and 5806, FWIW. > > That's what I was afraid of; it rather suggests that some submissions are going > astray without any moderator ever seeing them. Someone should probably check the > mail logs... Majordomo sends the reports to a limited number of moderators. For example, it may be configured to send to 2 moderators, and if there are more, no single moderator will get all of them. I think this system is silly, error prone (it's way too easy to hit the wrong key, particularly if traffic is large) and slow. If we want to reject spam in a web form, we shouldn't be using a mailing list spam moderation system. I think we should be using a "captcha" system like recaptcha. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: