Re: syslog_line_prefix
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: syslog_line_prefix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090928170705.GB5269@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: syslog_line_prefix (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: syslog_line_prefix
Re: syslog_line_prefix |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió: > [ please trim the quoted material a bit, folks ] > > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > > 2009/9/28 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: > >> The problem with having the syslogger send the data directly to an > >> external process is that the external process might be unable to > >> process the data as fast as syslogger is sending it. �I'm not sure > >> exactly what will happen in that case, but it will definitely be bad. > > This is the same issue already raised with respect to syslog versus > syslogger, ie, some people would rather lose log data than have the > backends block waiting for it to be written. That could be made configurable; i.e. let the user choose whether to lose messages or to make everybody wait. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: