Re: BUG #5066: plperl issues with perl_destruct() and END blocks

David Fetter escribió:

> Taken literally, that would mean, "the last action before the backend
> exits," but at least to me, that sounds troubling for the same reasons
> that "end of transaction" triggers do.  What happens when there are
> two different END blocks in a session?

The manual is clear that both are executed.

> With connection poolers, backends can last quite awhile.  Is it OK for
> the END block to run hours after the rest of the code?

This is an interesting point -- should END blocks be called on DISCARD ALL?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support