Re: [pgadmin-support] Possible simple enhancement
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgadmin-support] Possible simple enhancement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200909162350.50074.guillaume@lelarge.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgadmin-support] Possible simple enhancement (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgadmin-support] Possible simple enhancement
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Le mercredi 16 septembre 2009 à 09:53:26, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:09, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > > Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 18:47:24, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : > >> Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 09:57:55, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > >> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:34, Guillaume Lelarge > >> > <guillaume@lelarge.info> > >>[...] > >> > If we keep that, how about: > >> > "The query is longer than the maximum length, and has been truncated. > >> > " > >> > >> Well, we don't really know if it has been truncated. All we know is that > >> the query is at the maximum length. > > > > New version of the patch: > > > > * Previously, only the first 250 characters of the query were displayed. > > * We won't launch the query tool if the selected process is in <IDLE> or > > <IDLE in transaction> state. > > Quick comment: > The logic around getting the max length is wrong. If the query to get > it fails, the value of maxlength will be unspecified (the else > statement only comes in effect if the version is <8.4). How about just > initializing it to 1024 at the start of the function? Also, the > "delete set" should be inside the check for NULL value - with a NULL > returned you'll attempt to delete NULL. > /me ashamed. This is fixed. > >> Should we bother copying at all if it's short? > > > > Don't understand this one ?!?! > > I mean if it's cut off, should we actually start a query tool with it, > or should we just say "hey, this has been truncated" and *not* start > the query tool. > I think we should start it anyway because there is a chance that the query is complete. > >> If we keep that, how about: > >> "The query is longer than the maximum length, and has been truncated. " > > > > Well, we don't really know if it has been truncated. All we know is that > > the query is at the maximum length. > > We don't, but it's pretty likely. So change it to "it may have been > truncated"? :-) > Done. See the new version of this patch. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
Вложения
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: