Re: LATERAL
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LATERAL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090908011217.GF17756@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LATERAL (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LATERAL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert, * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Because as often as not, they're mistakes. Please don't think > > you're smarter than the spec here. > > You're frequently the first to criticize the spec, but I have no > interest in second-guessing whatever behavior the spec specifies for > this construct. I'm not entirely sure you followed what Tom was getting at here. If you did, feel free to ignore me. > I'm just trying to understand it, and as far as I can > tell, LATERAL() is just a piece of syntactic sugar that allows > expressions within to reference FROM items at the same query level. What I'm gathering is that this may be correct, though I don't know for sure. The point I think Tom was making is that even if it *is* just syntactic sugar, we don't want to allow expressions to reference FROM items at the same query level *unless* LATERAL is specified. Your earlier comments sounded like you would want to implement allowing expressions to refer to FROM items at the same query level without LATERAL being specified. > I haven't got a copy of the spec, so that's a bit of a handicap. If > someone who does can look this up and comment on how it's supposed to > work, I would certainly appreciate that. My understanding of it is > currently based on random articles cherry-picked around the Internet > and a handful of emails from archives.postgresql.org, which seems a > little thin. You can get a 'draft' that's very close to the spec pretty easily.. Just do '??sql' in IRC sometime.. Enjoy, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: