Re: manually setting the command tag (was Re: 8.4: suppress_redundant_updates trigger vs. "Upsert" logic)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: manually setting the command tag (was Re: 8.4: suppress_redundant_updates trigger vs. "Upsert" logic) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090907224527.GQ8894@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: manually setting the command tag (was Re: 8.4: suppress_redundant_updates trigger vs. "Upsert" logic) (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: manually setting the command tag (was Re: 8.4: suppress_redundant_updates trigger vs. "Upsert" logic)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule escribió: > 2009/9/7 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>: > > There are countless reports of trouble because somebody has an INSTEAD > > rule in the table, and the tag emits something that's not quite > > acceptable for some outer software layer. The problem is that there's > > no way at all to make the command tag behave! > > > > For example, we could offer a new SPI function, say SPI_settag(), which > > sets the command tag string. PL/pgSQL could expose this via a new > > command, for example COMMANDTAG. > > Isn't better to solve the the correct diagnostics for INSTEAD rules or triggers? As far as I can tell it's not possible to do better without letting the user put their hands on the tag. The problem is figuring out what command should determine the tag. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: