Re: Forrester: Ingres and MySQL Lead Open Source Databases
| От | Adrian Klaver |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Forrester: Ingres and MySQL Lead Open Source Databases |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200908231712.04633.aklaver@comcast.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Forrester: Ingres and MySQL Lead Open Source Databases (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Forrester: Ingres and MySQL Lead Open Source
Databases
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sunday 23 August 2009 4:03:58 pm Greg Stark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > So in the case of analysts, it's a case of "can we influence this > > analyst to produce a favorable report? How much will it cost, and how > > many people will it reach?" Not an argument of "are analysts good or > > bad." > > Well, how much would it cost? Can you outbid Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM? > > -- > greg > http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf It is not a question of out bidding these companies. It is about having a consistent message for when the PR firms come asking. And yes they can twist the answer to serve their needs, the important part is they find Postgres credible enough to contact in the first place. There is an old adage that says 'it is only bad publicity if the don't spell you name right'. The key is to get Postgres mentioned in the same breath as Oracle,IBM,Microsoft, etc. In the business world, if you are not a threat you are ignored. When companies take the time to bad mouth you it is because they perceive a threat. It happens enough times, other business are going to start asking why? That is when we point them to the facts and the community. -- Adrian Klaver aklaver@comcast.net
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: