Re: machine-readable explain output v4

On Monday 10 August 2009 14:39:22 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > I produced/mailed a relaxng version for a a bit older version and I plan
> > to refresh and document it once the format seems suitably stable. I am
> > not sure it is yet. If yes, this should not take that long...
> > (Relaxng because you easily can convert it into most other XML schema
> > description languages)
> I don't mind doing both, but I think one should be authoritative, and
> whatever the relative technical merits are (please, let's not debate
> that here) the fact after quite some years is that XML Schemas have much
> more traction. See the thread that starts at
> <http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200804/msg00058.html>. For
> example, Xerces-J supports XML Schemas natively.
I don't really mind which format gets choosen - I just had  relaxng one 
already done.
Do you plan to write a XML-Schema Schema? Just to avoid duplicated work...

Andres