Re: revised hstore patch
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: revised hstore patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200908090052.n790qM705785@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: revised hstore patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: revised hstore patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Perhaps an appropriate thing to do is separate out the representation > change from the other new features, and apply just the latter for now. > Or maybe we should think about having two versions of hstore. This > is all tied up in the problem of having a decent module infrastructure > (which I hope somebody is working on for 8.5). I don't know where > we're going to end up for 8.5, but I'm disinclined to let a fairly > minor contrib feature improvement break upgrade-compatibility before > we've even really started the cycle. I can just have pg_migrator detect hstore and require it be removed before upgrading; we did that already for 8.3 to 8.4 and I am assuming we will continue to have cases there pg_migrator just will not work. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: