Re: [PATCH 3/3] Document geqo_seed variable.
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Document geqo_seed variable. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200907151913.37041.andres@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Document geqo_seed variable. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 19:01:05 Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Bernd Helmle<mailings@oopsware.de> wrote: > > --On 15. Juli 2009 08:06:48 +0200 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> It should not create multiple threads I think as all messages were a > >> response the first mail? > > It does (at least my MUA understood that correctly), but since many > > people are reading in a "backlog"-style manner, i have to agree with > > Robert. It makes it a little bit harder to track all changes which are > > intended by a specific discussion. For me its easier, as the different discussions are kept separate... > Gmail starts a new thread if the subject line is changed, but I'm not > going to hold the entire world hostage to my preferred email client. > There are other problems, too, like if I want to apply this patch I > have to download multiple emails to do it, and multiple links have to > be added to the CommitFest app to reference the different parts. Referencing the top Mail seems enough for me. To apply patches from mail I have setup a filter which can apply an mbox directly... But as patches I send are not intended to be consumed by me, I will stop sending patches like that ;-) Andres PS: Gmail is a strange beast.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: