Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200907132238.n6DMcDZ08620@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after
pg_migrator
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Jamie Fox wrote: > > > > I can also see that the pg_largeobject table is different, in the pg_restore > > > version the Rows (estimated) is 316286 and Rows (counted) is the same, in > > > the pg_migrator version the Rows (counted) is only 180507. > > > Wow, I didn't test large objects specifically, and I am confused why > > there would be a count discrepancy. I will need to do some research > > unless someone else can guess about the cause. > > Maybe pg_largeobject is not getting frozen? That would explain the change in count, but I thought we froze _everything_, and had to. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: