Re: Vote on Windows installer links
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vote on Windows installer links |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200907091445.n69Eji601212@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vote on Windows installer links (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vote on Windows installer links
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > By the way, a quick look around shows that there are a few other instances of > advertisement on PostgreSQL sites. > > On www.p.o you have a link to the "server sponsors" and to tinysofa (not sure > if they are a commercial entity). > > archives.p.o and buildfarm.p.o have "hosted by Command Prompt" or some > variant. (Plus the buildfarm is sure to repeat that on just about every > page.) > > There is some imbalance here. Because these web sites (and the installer) are > the frontends that are exposed to the user, as opposed to code, letting those > who create and manage these aspects stick their name there could give them an > amount of exposure that is not proportional to the amount of contribution to > the overall project effort. That is further skewed because we have a fairly > restrictive policy on the extent to which individuals and companies are > credited in code and release notes. Yep. > (Yes, there is a list of project sponsors, but that isn't really easy to find, > let alone stumble upon. Plus I think it's pretty bogus.) > > This is an uneasy peace. If I wanted to, for example, I could stick my name > or the name of my sponsors on a lot of things in PostgreSQL, because I > technically host or manage them or have the ability to edit the relevant HTML > or text files. Or if you want to get easy exposure, I think the easiest way > is to just start hosting things. > > There isn't a good way out of this except requiring that all PostgreSQL things > be hosted on postgresql.org servers and are not branded or otherwise decorated > with third party labels, and that everything else is explicitly marked as > "third party". This could be done, but will this degrade the user experience? > > In the meantime, I suggest you follow the revised version of the old saying: > "If you can't beat them, join them, then beat them." ;-) Excellent analysis. No question it is imbalanced, as I mentioned in my "edge" email earlier, and yea, I don't see a good way to balance it either. Perhaps the only maxim I can think of is if you want PR, do edge stuff, which in a way is the opposite message we want to send, but in a way the edge stuff is easier for external entities to manage. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: