Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200907050507.n6557qv29112@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > >>> Consistency here is pointless. IIRC the dual method is used in contrib > >>> because people did not trust the PGXS stuff enough to rip the original > >>> Make code out; or maybe because people did not want PGXS to become the > >>> default build method, but they allowed it to be used in contrib as a > >>> test bed that PGXS worked. > >> The main reason contrib still has the alternate method is that PGXS > >> doesn't really work until after you've installed the core build. > >> For modules distributed separately from core, it doesn't seem that > >> exciting to be able to build using the contrib method. > >> > >> Now, having said that, I'm personally interested in being able to build > >> pg_migrator against an uninstalled source tree, because I foresee > >> needing to do that for RPM packaging purposes. But I could easily patch > >> the makefiles if needed to make that happen. I don't think this case > >> should drive the choice of what's the default or common method. > > > > Well, PGXS is now the recommended install method in the pg_migrator > > INSTALL file. What other changes should I make? > > Since PGXS does not work under Windows, I think the only way to build > non-contrib extensions on Windows is the contrib way (i.e. place in > contrib folder and use contrib style Makefile). I assume this work too: gmake top_builddir=/usr/src/pgsql install -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: