Re: Changed error message for blocks by prepared transactions
От | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changed error message for blocks by prepared transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090623111638.02f75579@iridium.wars-nicht.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changed error message for blocks by prepared transactions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:24:28 -0400 Tom Lane wrote: > "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail@wars-nicht.de> writes: > > the small attached patch changes the error message for a blocked > > database in case there are prepared transactions. > > Isn't this duplicative of the errdetail_busy_db code? And anyway > I do not see a reason not to consider prepared transactions as > "other users". Because you know the details. Most other users check pg_stat_activity just to find out there is no other user connected. A prepared transaction is not a connected user, so the error message is still misleading. You are right with the errdetail_busy_db(), but that's only true for 8.4, not for earlier versions. In addition that's only true if you haven't supressed the hints like some scripts do (-q as example). Bye -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum German PostgreSQL User Group European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project PGDay.eu 2009 in Paris, Nov. 6/7, http://www.pgday.eu/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: