Re: security checks for largeobjects?
| От | David Fetter |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: security checks for largeobjects? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20090622152227.GA4280@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: security checks for largeobjects? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: security checks for largeobjects?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: > > > KaiGai Kohei wrote: > > > > The todo list says, as follows: > > > > * Binary Data > > > > o Add security checks for large objects > > > > > > > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data > > > > > > > > Is anyone working on? or interested in? > > > > > > OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item. > > > I'll also submit this feature on the v8.5 development cycle. > > > > This seems related to SQL/MED's file handling portion. Perhaps the > > TODO should be merged into the SQL/MED one. > > MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal, > no? It depends on your definition. The lo interface is pretty much to objects on the file system directly. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: