Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
От | Kenneth Marshall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090618234746.GG23785@it.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:20:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > > Any objections if I add: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-06/msg00215.php > > to the (currently empty) list of open items for 8.4? > > I am unable to duplicate any slowdown on this test case. AFAICT > 8.4 and 8.3 branch tip are about the same speed; if anything 8.4 > is faster. Testing on x86_64 Fedora 10 ... > > regards, tom lane > What is not clear from Stefen's function listing is how the 8.4 server could issue 33% more XLogInsert() and CopyReadLine() calls than the 8.3.7 server using the same input file. That would account for the slow down but now why it is happening. Cheers, Ken
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: