Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200906181655.31066.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Saturday 06 June 2009 16:21:22 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Now that pg_migrator is in beta > > (http://pgfoundry.org/frs/?group_id=1000235), I was wondering if we want > > to mention pg_migrator anywhere in our docs or release notes? Josh > > Berkus is already mentioning it in the draft press release. > > Having gotten no replies I assume we don't want to mention pg_migrator > in the release notes or documentation, which is fine. It is mentioned > in the press release. Will you eventually want to ship pg_migrator in contrib? If so, then documentation will be added when that happens. If not, we should add a link somewhere where the upgrade process is described (installation instructions, I think). The makefile for pg_migrator currently assumes by default that it is located under contrib/. Which confuses me.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: