Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090617144832.GM860@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Playing with set returning functions in SELECT list - behaviour intended?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:06:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes: > > So it looks like the number of result rows is the least common > > multiple of the cardinalities of all columns in the select list. > > It's always been that way. The lack of any obviously-sane way to > handle multiple SRFs in a targetlist is exactly why the feature is > looked on with disfavor. I must be missing something obvious. Isn't the nested loop thing that happens with generate_series() pretty sane? SELECT generate_series(1,2) AS i, generate_series(1,3) AS j; i | j ---+--- 1 | 1 2 | 2 1 | 3 2 | 1 1 | 2 2 | 3 (6 rows) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: