Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200906112322.n5BNMbb28522@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document struct/union problem with pgindent. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > + # Structure/union pointers in function prototypes and definitions have an extra > > + # space after the asterisk: > > + # > > + # void x(struct xxc * a); > > > I know we should not be driven by our tools, but is there a case for a > > coding standard that requires use of a typedef name here? > > I don't think so. Shall we artificially create a typedef for standard > objects like "struct stat" in order to follow such a coding rule? I > think that's just a recipe for confusion. > > In any case, a big fraction of the places that have this issue are code > that we've imported from elsewhere (the regex engine, zic) and changing > to typedefs would mean even more drift from upstream and hence > difficulty in following their patches. > > It's just a bug in pgindent that we should try to fix sometime. I would hope switching to GNU indent would fix this, but might bring new bugs. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: