Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1

In message <20090511144317.GC8689@alvh.no-ip.org>, Alvaro Herrera writes:
   Magnus Hagander wrote:      > Another thought: if we were to make ourselves support multiple SSL   > libraries (that
hasbeen suggested before - at that point, people wanted   > GnuTLS), we could also add support for Windows SChannel,
whichI'm sure   > some win32 people would certainly prefer - much easier to do SSL   > deployments within an existing
MSinfrastructure...      If we were to support multiple libraries, would they be selected at run   time or compile
time? If only compile time, how would it work for the   Windows installer with the SChannel thingy --- would they have
to  distribute two separate packages, for OpenSSL and SChannel?
 

While I have successfully performed runtime conditional dynamic
loading inside programs (each shared library with its own list of
dependent libraries) on one platform with one selected dynamic loading
API, I cannot say I recommend it.  This would aid neither portability,
debug-ability, or performance (though compared to the overhead of SSL,
the jump table is kinda irrelevant).
                -Seth Robertson                 in-pgsql-hackers@baka.org