Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200904221334.n3MDYrf20635@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df (tomas@tuxteam.de) |
Ответы |
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:32:20AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > [...] > > > True, but the problem is that the brackets don't correspond [...] > > Yes, right. Still, square brackets seem (to me) to provide some visual > cue. But I admit that this is already advanced bikeshedding and thus > I'll politely bow out :-) No problem; we like polish here. ;-) If I can get someone else to say they prefer brackets over parentheses in \? I will make the change. Right now we have: \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list (only agg/normal/trigger/window) functions With brackets it would be: \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: