Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090421165742.GK15679@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:33:26AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:26:13AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 12:19 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > > I suggested this to Bruce over IM: > > > > > > \df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions > > > > > > (one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems > > > clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users. But really, if > > > you can understand the [S+] stuff you should be able to get the [antw] > > > stuff too, right? > > > > > > > +1 to Alvaro. > > Now psql allows you to mix all of the options freely (scary math word > ahead) in an idempotent way. In other words, this works: > > \df++aannSw > > Expressed as a regex, it's \\df[antwS+]* > > Cheers, > David. Oh, and I forgot to send some error-handling and cleanup code per Alvaro. Please find attached. :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: