Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200904211630.n3LGUbA09550@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions > > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions > > Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe: > > \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions > > Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might > be adequate. Agreed. The problem is I don't see curly braces used anywhere in \?, but now that I look at it it is just because there is no need for them. How about this: \\df{antw}[S+] [PATRN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions In a way though, they are really still optional, they are just not optional for this specific line. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: