Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090421161957.GP10358@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions > > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions > > Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe: > > \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions > > Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might > be adequate. I suggested this to Bruce over IM: \df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions (one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users. But really, if you can understand the [S+] stuff you should be able to get the [antw] stuff too, right? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: