Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook

On Monday 20 April 2009 09:52:05 Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I don't believe so is possible to find other general solution. (or
> better I didn't find any other solution). Tom has true,
> transformationHook on expression is expensive. I thing, so hook on
> function should be simple and fast - not all transformation's should
> be simple defined via property - classic sample is "decode" like
> functions, it needs procedural code.

I find this all a bit premature, given that you haven't clearly defined what 
sort of user-visible functionality you hope to end up implementing.  Which 
makes it hard to argue why this or that approach might be better.