Re: select distinct, index not used
От | Sam Mason |
---|---|
Тема | Re: select distinct, index not used |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090416164247.GP12225@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: select distinct, index not used (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: select distinct, index not used
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:29:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > , a full table indexscan isn't going to be particularly fast in > any case; it's often the case that seqscan-and-sort is the right > decision. Is PG capable of "skipping" over duplicate values using an index? For example, if I've got a table like: CREATE TABLE foo ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, v1 BOOLEAN ); that contains several million rows and I do a query like: SELECT DISTINCT v1 FROM foo; PG should only need to read three tuples from the table (assuming there are no dead rows). I've had a look in the TODO, but haven't found anything similar. This is obviously only a win when there are few distinct values from compared to the number of rows. -- Sam http://samason.me.uk/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: