Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090414185232.GS7709@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I had a second thought about that: presumably we should make the > function type names translatable. If we do that, it might be better > to make the aggregate case be "aggregate" and take the width hit. > Otherwise translators are going to be puzzled when they come across > "agg" as a translatable phrase. I think it's good to have them translatable. As for using "aggregate" instead of "agg" I don't think it's that great an idea. If you need to notify translators that "agg" stands for "aggregate", add a /* translator: */ comment. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: