Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:35:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > It occurs to me that we ought to allow for a possibility that a
> > function can be more than one special case.  For example, sum() is
> > both an aggregate and a windowing function, while rank() is only a
> > windowing function.
> 
> If it makes the display even one character wider, -1 from me.
> That's a purely hypothetical problem for the classification
> we're discussing.  (No, I don't feel a need for \df to remind
> me every time that aggregates can also be window functions.)

OK :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate