Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200904101956.n3AJu2m23881@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > It would be nice to know if we are ever going to set > > standard_conforming_strings to on. > > My personal bias is to go to the standard behavior as the default at > some point. For legacy reasons, I don't know that you would ever want > to remove the setting; especially since I don't think it adds much > code if you're going to support the E'...' literals. The ugliest > thing about this GUC is that it adds some complications to the flex > code, but it doesn't seem that bad to me. Agreed, we would probably never remove standard_conforming_strings. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: