Re: psql \d* and system objects
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \d* and system objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200903301452.n2UEql627311@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql \d* and system objects (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql \d* and system objects
Re: psql \d* and system objects Re: psql \d* and system objects |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Maybe the best we are going to do is to have any pattern supplied to \d* > > assume 'S' (include system objects). ?I actually have a patch that does > > that, attached. (It is from January so might need adjustment.) > > That still has the problem that "\df a*" is horribly inconsistent with > "\df". It might be reasonable to assume that if a name without > wildcards is given to any \d command, it should display whatever > object it finds, user or system - but I can't see doing it for any > wildcard at all. I think you are re-iterating the URL I referenced when I started this thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg01443.php I think the big question is whether the inconsistency (pattern implies 'S') is worth accepting for greater usability. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: