Re: typedefs for indent

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Well, as you, I was hoping for a clear solution, and it seems we don't
> > > > have one.  I think the false-positives problem is real and might make
> > > > the greater code coverage of the buildfarm worse than what we did for
> > > > 8.3.
> > > 
> > > Huh?  What false positive problem?
> > 
> > typedefs listed on platforms that match identifiers in our code that are
> > _not_ typedefs.
> 
> Does this actually happen anywhere?

No idea;  it was more a theoretical issue to say that having more
typedefs is not necessarily a good thing;  they should ideally be the
typedefs we use, and Windows adds a lot of typedefs we don't use.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +