Re: DTrace probes broken in HEAD on Solaris?
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DTrace probes broken in HEAD on Solaris? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090324225317.GC24546@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DTrace probes broken in HEAD on Solaris? (Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DTrace probes broken in HEAD on Solaris?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:18:08PM +0000, Greg Stark wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout > <kleptog@svana.org> wrote: > > Not really a GCC extension, but you could have the macro check that it > > can take the address of the arguments, which amounts to almost the same > > thing. It only doesn't work on constants. > > No, there are all kinds of complex expressions which are lvalues -- > anything ending in a pointer dereference for example, which is > precisely the most likely kind of expression to introduce seg fault if > something is unexpectedly null Sorry, I meant to say that the compiler could determine the address at compile time, something like: __builtin_constant_p( !&(__x)) ) Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while > boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: