Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090322134802.GA16373@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Gierth wrote: > I've been thinking about this, and my conclusion is that schemas as > they currently exist are the wrong tool for making modules/packages. This has been discussed at length previously, and we even had an incomplete but substantive patch posted. Did you review that? Some of it appears to be in line of what you're proposing here. If you're interested in this area, perhaps you could pick up where Tom Dunstan left off. See URLs here: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Source_Code under "Improve the module installation experience (/contrib, etc)" -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: