Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200903120826.29273.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > Discuss the implications of changing such a GUC partway > through this sequence. For extra credit, explain what would happen if > it were set via ALTER ROLE SET for one role or the other. > > In short: -1 from me. Heh. That's your best rejection yet. Someday I'll print out all the rejection e-mails from you and wallpaper my office. ;-) I guess what I'm really hoping to do is to hack ROLEs into a primitive resource management tool. Maybe this is the wrong approach, but we need *something* in this vein, and from an application development perspective combining permissions, connections and resource allocation via ROLES makes a lot of sense. The SET ROLE issue comes in pretty much for login management. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: