Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 17:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote: 
> > > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 06:15 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Again, I'm not planning to get rid of any existing capabilities 
> > > 
> > > Good
> > > 
> > > > unless necessary.
> > > 
> > > That is not a caveat I will accept, a priori.
> > 
> > What does "accept" mean above?  Are you the sole acceptor for this
> > feature?  That is surprising to me.
> > 
> > You can say you would vote against it but your wording above seems
> > overly controlling.
> 
> I would hope my words carry the same weight as others when people speak
> of what can and cannot be included, when backed by reasonable and
> logical technical reasons.
> 
> Some things are important, some not, and I've done my best to use words
> that indicate my views on that. 

I think you need to work on improving your word choice then.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +