Re: Pet Peeves?
От | rhubbell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090207213336.0b286d3b.Rhubbell@iHubbell.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pet Peeves? (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 19:30:37 -0800 Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2009, at 7:09 PM, rhubbell wrote: > > > In the case of DBD::Pg it seems that it just uses the output of > > pg_config. It seems absurd that that information can't be stored in > > psql. There must be some good reason that it's not. > > Is it because psql is stripped? > > > > At least the build information (which pg_config spits out) could be > > stored > > in a text file that psql knows about and then psql --buildopts would > > give you that information. > > But what would you do with the information then? Most anything > (including > building DBD::Pg) that wants that data is going to need the developer > package. Oh, that's right DBD::Pg needs to compile against the pg dev bits. > > Cheers, > Steve > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: