Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090122023226.GF32428@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce, et al, * Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote: > \dg [PATTERN] list roles (groups) > \du [PATTERN] list roles (users) Seeing this list reminded me of a pet-peeve.. \du and \dg actually show the same info, that's fine, but neither of them show the rolcanlogin value. As someone who has a bad habit of doing 'create role blah;' for new users this can get very annoying. I also have people complain to me that they can't figure out why a new user can't log in after they did the same thing. Could we get that changed? Or maybe have 'connections' say something different when you don't have rolcanlogin besides 'no limit'? > \dp [PATTERN] list table, view, and sequence access privileges erp, I don't think I changed this in my column-level privleges patch.. Should we explicitly mention column in this list? Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: