Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200901211929.44450.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 16 January 2009 04:09:11 Robert Haas wrote: > I really wonder what is so terrible about the behavrior as implemented > in CVS HEAD. AFAICS, no one except maybe Tom has really specified WHY > they don't like it, just that they don't like it. I'm not sure > whether that's because (1) it's different, and they're used to the old > way; (2) it involves typing an extra character to get the behavior > they want; or (3) there's no way to search user and system functions > simultaneously. Btw., the reason why I didn't like it is that hiding system tables is OK, because you never really interact with them, but hiding system functions is not, because you use those all the time. It has emerged, however, that some people appear to think of \df in terms of "what's available" and some in terms of "what have I done". And those call for different behaviors.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: