Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090116034129.GU4656@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> But I may be trying to push water up a hill, so, I can live with > >> adding \dfU and keeping \df as-was. > > > BTW, why the capital? \dfu is *considerably* easier to type than \dfU. > > Because (1) its counterpart S is capitalized by historical tradition, > and (2) we are going to apply this to all the variants of \d so we'd > have a conflict with \du. (Even if we special-cased our way out of the > actual conflict, there would certainly be user confusion there.) > > Also (3) you are not actually going to use this as much as you think > you are, so saving a shift keypress is not the be-all and end-all. Well, and (4), you could always 'remap' it, if you will: -- obviously with \\dfU if it gets added postgres*=> \set df '\\df' postgres*=> :df List of functions [...] I use ':r' for 'rollback;' all the time (not my idea, someone on IRC), but a : tends to be as easy for me as \. <shrug> I wouldn't complain about a more generic aliasing ability in psql, mind you. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: